<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AmpAviators &#187; Joe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ampaviators.com/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ampaviators.com</link>
	<description>Unbiased information on all aspects of radio controlled electric planes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>SuperCub Lipo Mod (deluxe)</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2008/09/25/supercub-lipo-mod-deluxe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2008/09/25/supercub-lipo-mod-deluxe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hobby Zone Super Cub]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading many forums, I wanted to modify my Supercub to benefit from the power and capacity of Lipo batteries but keep the stock motor, radio and ESC (for ease and expense). I also wanted to include 3 key features in this mod - Minimal battery box changes (preferably none) - Ability to switch between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">After reading many forums, I wanted to modify my Supercub to benefit from the power and capacity of Lipo batteries but keep the stock motor, radio and ESC (for ease and expense).</span></p>
<p><span id="more-111"></span></p>
<p>I also wanted to include 3 key features in this mod</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-</span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"> Minimal battery box changes (preferably none)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-</span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"> Ability to switch between using Lipo and the NiMh battery types</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-</span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"> Ability to monitor Lipo usage</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The pre-requisites for this mod are: </span></p>
<ol style="margin-top: 0in">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">To convert the ESC, Charger and Batteries to Deans Ultra connectors (or some other<br />
type better than the stock connectors).</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">To mark on the fuselage (just under the wing) the centre of gravity (CoG) of the<br />
stock plane with stock battery. Using a finger either side of the plane<br />
under the wings and marking the balance point with a Sharpie.</span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The first objective, to avoid battery box changes is mainly achieved<br />
through the selection of your Lipo battery. This limits you to a maximum length<br />
of 67mm which are the ‘square’ shaped batteries usually between 1000mAh and<br />
1300mAh capacity 3s (11.1v) batteries. While this is a capacity limitation from<br />
the 1800 to 2200mAh 3s average, I felt it worth the compromise.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Many people on forums chose the Thunderpower which should be ‘drop-in’.<br />
I chose the cheaper $21 hexTronic 1300mAh from Hobbycity which is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">supposed</span><br />
to be 65mm long. In fact the hexTronic was about 10mm longer that the spec<br />
which was very annoying. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="margin: 5px; float: left" title="pic1.jpg" src="/images/stories/articles/sclipomod/pic1.jpg" alt="pic1.jpg" width="1024" height="768" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Getting this slightly over-sized Lipo to fit required me to remove the<br />
rear side of the battery box using a scalpel / craft knife. The white battery<br />
box plastic carves quite easily with a sharp knife and this could be done without<br />
removing the box from the plane. This allowed the battery to lay horizontally<br />
in the box using the stock battery box door, the receiver could be kept in the<br />
stock location above the battery box and velcro strap was still functional.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial">Next was adding a switch to select between Lipo and NiMh LVC (low<br />
voltage cut-off). This was achieved by using a standard receiver switch to<br />
control the LVC jumper on the receiver. I re-used the lead and connector from one<br />
of the ACT sensors I had previously removed to extend the length of the switch<br />
wires. I connected one side of the switch to the jumper header on the receiver<br />
and ‘shorted’ the other side using the previously removed jumper. (Note, a<br />
future mod would be to cut, join and solder the wires on this other side of the<br />
switch to save a gram or two).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<div><img title="pic2.jpg" src="/images/stories/articles/sclipomod/pic2.jpg" alt="pic2.jpg" width="320" height="240" align="middle" /></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The switch now controls the LVC jumper. When in the ‘on’ position, the<br />
jumper is closed, which is the NiMh position for a lower LVC. When the switch<br />
is ‘off’, the jumper is open, which is the Lipo position for the 9v LVC.<span> </span>The switch can now be tested using a<br />
multimeter circuit tester. It is then a good idea to test the LVC is working as<br />
expected by connecting a charged stock 8.4v battery and switching to Lipo mode<br />
(9v LVC). The propeller should turn as normal until the throttle reaches ~ ¾<br />
and then cut out. Changing the jumper switch should allow the throttle to be<br />
opened up to the max without anything cutting out.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="margin: 5px; float: left" title="pic3.jpg" src="/images/stories/articles/sclipomod/pic3.jpg" alt="pic3.jpg" width="1024" height="768" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">For easy access (and easy removal if required) I located the switch at<br />
the bottom of the plane in the middle of the holes already in the plane<br />
fuselage. It was secured in place by the face plate compressing the foam and is<br />
not going anywhere.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The final part of this mod was to utilize a $5 Lipo battery monitor<br />
(Maxpro from Hobbycity). This monitor fits onto the battery balancing<br />
connector, has a really small </span><span style="font-family: Arial">current<br />
draw (~ 5mA)</span><span style="font-family: Arial"> and automatically indicates the battery voltage with an LED and beeper<br />
as follows:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;"><br />
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family: Arial">above<br />
11.0v it’s bright blue</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;"><br />
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family: Arial">between<br />
10.0 and 11.0v it’s blinking blue</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;"><br />
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family: Arial">between<br />
9.8 and 10.0v it’s bright red</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family: Arial"><span>-<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;"><br />
</span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family: Arial">under<br />
9.8v it’s beeping and blinking red<br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br />
<!--[endif]--></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">I located the<br />
battery monitor where the lower ACT sensor used to be, between the battery box<br />
and the holes used to hold the LVC switch. I feed the monitor wires through the<br />
sensor hole to the battery box area. I then marked around the sensor and then used<br />
a hot soldering iron to increase the sensor recess to fit the monitor flush<br />
with the bottom of the fuselage. The monitor was secured with a few drops of CA<br />
glue and some temporary tape to hold it in place while the glue dried. Once<br />
dry, the sensor was covered using clear and then nylon reinforced packing tape<br />
(which helped hide the green circuit board)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="margin: 5px; float: left" title="pic4.jpg" src="/images/stories/articles/sclipomod/pic4.jpg" alt="pic4.jpg" width="1024" height="768" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">I then changed the stock propeller (10&#215;8) for a 10&#215;7 one to reduce the<br />
power draw on the ESC. Many forum entries and the propeller testing on this<br />
site recommend the 10&#215;6 size and being optimal but I was worried I wouldn’t<br />
have enough power for the test flight and so decided to try the 10&#215;7 as a<br />
compromise first. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Finally I re-checked the centre of gravity and confirmed that it had not<br />
measurably moved from the previously marked position.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The final Lipo ready setup looks like this:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img style="margin: 5px; width: 768px; height: 1024px;" title="pic5.jpg" src="/images/stories/articles/sclipomod/pic5.jpg" alt="pic5.jpg" width="768" height="1024" align="middle" /><span style="font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-size: 14pt"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial">Flight Testing</span></strong></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 14pt"> with the Lipo …..</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">The blue light obviously comes on as soon as the balancer plug is<br />
connected. The red light and beeping would continue until the balancer plug is<br />
removed… seems a bit annoying, and I toyed with the idea of putting in another<br />
switch, but when you think about if the voltage is below 10v, you really shouldn’t<br />
just <span> </span>be getting the plane down, you need<br />
to remove the battery to stop the battery drain of the receiver. So annoying is<br />
a good thing. Actually I think the blue light when flying looks really cool,<br />
especially at dusk.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Power. With the stock battery, the throttle started turning the prop at<br />
about 1/3 of the way up and progressively increased the rpm to full throttle. With<br />
the Lipo the propeller started turning earlier at ~1/4 of the way up and the<br />
increasing rpms seemed to top out at about 70% of the way up. No noticeable<br />
increase between 70% to 100% throttle. However there was definitely more<br />
incremental control between 25% and 50%.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">50% throttle gave significantly more power than my upgraded 8cell (9.6v)<br />
NiMh battery at full power. I did most of my straight and level flying at ~35%<br />
throttle. Brief wide open throttle got the SuperCub climbing steeply. Cruising<br />
at 70% throttle needed work at keeping the plane level, but I didn’t spend much<br />
time at this speed and didn’t bother trying to trim for it (on my first<br />
flight).<span> </span>I couldn’t say if there was any<br />
noticeable difference in the air between 70% and 100% and there was absolutely<br />
no need to go above 70%.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Rolling and hand launched takeoffs were very easy with the SuperCub<br />
leaping into the air at 70+% throttle. This was noticeably much easier and more<br />
positive. Pulling loops was easy although with NiMh batteries I had never<br />
bothered to reduce throttle after passing over the top. With Lipos, once over<br />
the top with max throttle the plane accelerated like a rocket towards the<br />
ground (luckily I had plenty of height), but this really showed me what the<br />
plane was now capable of once I graduate from my current straight and level style<br />
of flying.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">General handling and landings were no difference to normal. The battery<br />
monitor blue light was clearly visible whenever I flew near, even at ~500+<br />
feet.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">After two flights and a touch and go circuit for 15+ minutes the blue<br />
light was still on, so I can’t comment on the red light or beeping.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">Once home, I checked the battery and it was still at 11.4v, so the<br />
monitor was correct (blue &gt; 11v). Also after charging, the 15+ minute flight<br />
had used only 850mAh of the battery, amazingly only 65% of the 1300mAh rated<br />
capacity. This length of flight would have previously taken me about half way<br />
into my second NiMh batteries. It made me smile as I had taken 2 x 1300 Lipos,<br />
and both my old 7 and 8 cell NiMh batteries to the field, just in case !</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">This confirmed what I had read, that the Lipo conversion is relatively<br />
easy to complete and pays dividends with additional power AND flight time. I<br />
have already changed the prop down to the recommended 10&#215;6 size for my next<br />
flight which should lower the max power a little (there’s tons to spare so I<br />
don’t see this as an issue) and further increase flight times.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial">I think the LVC switch of this mod may prove redundant as I can’t see<br />
myself using NiMh out of preference and the 2 Lipos I purchased will be more<br />
that enough for my flying.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"><strong>PS</strong> – You may have noticed my wing strut fastener mod… a bent paperclip<br />
which slots under the battery box door latch. One end is closed and the other<br />
end slightly open like a hook. This makes removing the wings quick and easy<br />
with no need for a screwdriver.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2008/09/25/supercub-lipo-mod-deluxe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converting a &#8220;Chuck Glider&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/14/converting-a-chuck-glider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/14/converting-a-chuck-glider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted something for equipment checks with no time invested and very little money wasted. So here is a plane that cost about $5 and took two hours to build from start to first flight. It&#8217;s one of those styro chuck gliders. I added a 1/8 sheet tail, 1/8 ailerons, popsicle sticks for servo mounts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted something for equipment checks with no time invested and very little money wasted. So here is a plane that cost about $5 and took two hours to build from start to first flight.</p>
<p><span id="more-103"></span></p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/package1.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="270" height="633" /></div>
<p>It&#8217;s one of those styro chuck gliders. I added a 1/8 sheet tail, 1/8 ailerons, popsicle sticks for servo mounts and part of an orange crate for a lite ply firewall.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it and it flew great. The wings flexed too much so I covered the wing with some 4 inch wide clear packing tape &#8211; it stiffens the wing a lot.</p>
<p>By the way, this would probably make a good aileron trainer. I flew it again and it flies much better with the tape on the wing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick build explanation so you can duplicate this plane:</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Motor Installation </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The motor is an E-Max CF 2212, $15.00; the battery is a 900 MAH 3 cell &#8211; $22.00 &#8211; both from Blackdogrc.</p>
<p>1. Cut nose off fuselage at 5 1/4 inches, measured from forward edge of wing cut out.<br />
Trace nose on Lite ply, 1/8 approximate. I used ply from orange crate.<br />
Glue ply to fuse,I used Gorilla glue, Titebond or epoxy will also work.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/nosecut3.jpg" border="0" alt="Cut" width="700" height="307" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/firewall5.jpg" border="0" alt="Front" width="700" height="389" /></div>
<p>2. Wings. Sand leading edge to round shape, my glider came through with a flat leading edge. Cover wing with packing tape. I used wide clear tape.</p>
<p>3. Glue wing to fuselage, I used GWS glue, but Gorilla glue or epoxy will also work.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Stabilizer Cut and Fit </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stablne9.jpg" border="0" alt="Body Measure" width="800" height="270" /></div>
<p>4. Place yardstick along bottom side of wing, mark line at rear of fuselage.</p>
<p>Mark up from line 3/8 and 1/2 inch and draw parallel lines. This is for stab opening. Cut open, I used a band saw, but a hacksaw or knife should also work. See pictures.</p>
<p>5. Cut stab from sheet of 1/8 thick balsa.<br />
Mine is 19 3/4 long, that&#8217;s the piece I had laying around, a little shorter should be OK.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stablayout1.jpg" border="0" alt="Diagram" width="600" height="400" /></div>
<p>I cut leading edge back to give leading edge a sweep. I took the pieces I cut off and turned them around and re glued them back on the leading edge.</p>
<p>6. Glue stab to fuselage, I used epoxy.<br />
The elevator is 1 inch wide 1/8 thick balsa, hinged at 4 places.<br />
I used GWS hinges, with GWS glue. CA hinges will also work.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stabline11.jpg" border="0" alt="Stab Cut" width="700" height="386" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stabslot8.jpg" border="0" alt="Stab Cut" width="700" height="454" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stabwdth12.jpg" border="0" alt="Stab Measure" width="524" height="590" /></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Final Assembly </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>7. The ailerons are 1 inch wide by 24 1/4&#8243; long, made of 1/8&#8243; balsa &#8211; that was the size piece I had &#8211; a little shorter would still work.</p>
<p>8. Next hinge the ailerons &#8211; I used 3 hinges per side, GWS hinges with GWS glue.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/ailhngd6w.jpg" border="0" alt="Ail Build" width="800" height="380" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/stabon9.jpg" border="0" alt="Body View" width="800" height="438" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/aillngt8.jpg" border="0" alt="Ail Measure" width="700" height="648" /></div>
<p>Cut servo openings, glue popsicle sticks to wing for servo mounts.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/ailser4.jpg" border="0" alt="Servos" width="800" height="598" /></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>The Finished Product </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The CG balance point is 2 inches back from the leading edge at the side of the fuselage.<br />
The plane flies over 15 minutes at half power, and with a little wind it thermaled; with full power it climbs quite steeply.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/rtf10w.jpg" border="0" alt="Done" width="700" height="376" /></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/top12w.jpg" border="0" alt="Top View RTF" width="800" height="501" /></div>
<p>The thread on this topic can be found <a href="http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20347" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/14/converting-a-chuck-glider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boomer&#8217;s Black Wing Build</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/07/boomers-black-wing-build/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/07/boomers-black-wing-build/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RC SuperPowers is marketing an inexpensive foamie that looks great and is an easy build &#8211; I saw Boomer&#39;s mods to the basic kit and he kindly agreed to allow us to post his work. &#160; BlackWing 3D &#8211; $9.99 &#160; Dimensions in inches: 26.5 wide / 19.5 long / 8.75 high Weight in ounces: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RC SuperPowers is marketing an inexpensive foamie that looks great and is an easy build &#8211; I saw Boomer&#39;s mods to the basic kit and he kindly agreed to allow us to post his work.<br />
<br /><span id="more-102"></span>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.rcpowers.com/BlackWing/bwabout.htm" target="_new"><strong>BlackWing 3D &#8211; $9.99</strong></a>
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/bwpic.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="590" height="451" />
</div>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
<span>Dimensions in inches: 26.5 wide / 19.5 long / 8.75 high<br />
Weight in ounces: 2.4oz foam kit / Approx. 10oz flying weight</span>
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
<strong>Recommended Gear:</strong>
</p>
<ul>
<li>4 + channel radio with elevator/aileron mixing (elevons)
	</li>
<li>(3) Hitec 56 servos
	</li>
<li>E-flite 400 Outrunner
	</li>
<li>25 amp ESC
	</li>
<li>1300 mAh 3 cell Lithium
	</li>
<li>10&#215;3.8 APC Prop
	</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Hardware needed:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>(1) 3mm, 26&quot; long, carbon rod
	</li>
<li>(2) 3mm, 8 ½&quot; long, carbon rods
	</li>
<li>(1) 2-3mm, 14&quot; long carbon rod
	</li>
<li>(2) 4 ½&quot; x 1 1/8&quot; x 3/8&quot; pieces of balsa wood
	</li>
<li>Control linkage, hinges or aileron tape
	</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tools:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>30 min epoxy
	</li>
<li>Toothpicks (10)
	</li>
<li>Pins (10)
	</li>
<li>Razor blade / hobby knife
	</li>
<li>Screwdriver + (4) 1/2&quot; screws for motor mount
	</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Paint:</strong></p>
<p>
The BlackWing 6mm depron kit comes in 8 precut pieces and can easily be put together in a couple evenings. Kit also includes detailed photographic directions. Remember, it does not come with the radio, servos, battery, motor, supports, or hardware. The BlackWing is intended for intermediate flyers with RC airplane experience, preferably someone who has already built and flown other 3D models.
</p>
<p>
Download the <a href="http://www.rcpowers.com/BlackWing/BWInstructions.htm" target="_new"><strong>Manual</strong></a>.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Above courtesy of RC SuperPowers.com
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
<strong><span>ED NOTE: Boomer&#39;s was kind enough to allow us to post his Black Wing Build &#8211; what is interesting are the mods from the stock kit that Boomer added &#8211; they are shown below in pictures:</span></strong>
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20top%20progress.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20bottom%20progress.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Bottom%20View.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="446" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Semi-Finished%20Bottom%20View%20.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="508" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/Firewall%20Brace%20Top%20View.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/Quarter%20inch%20Balsa%20braces.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/Firewall%20Brace.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Landing%20Gear.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/LG%20Brace%20Axle%20Attachment.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/Rear%20LG%20Anchor.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/Tail%20Skid.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Front%20Side%20View.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Finished%20Front%20View%20.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="445" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Rear%20Qtr%20View.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="480" />
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW%20Finished%20Top%20View%20Rear.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="640" height="408" />
</div>
<p>
<!--</p>
<p><div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW Front Qtr View.jpg" width=640 height=480 border=0 alt="Pic">
</div>
<p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/BW Finished Side View .jpg" width=640 height=429 border=0 alt="Pic">
</div>
<p>
&#8211;>
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Boomer&#39;s Performance Notes
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
I ran power meter tests using a 1200 3S 20C Polyquest pack weighing 3.7 oz and a 2100 3S Apex 15C pack weighing 5.6 oz.<br />
The 1200 pack read 106 Watts @ 11.6 Amps and the 2100 pack read 165 Watts @ 15 Amps.
</p>
<p>
The 15 Amp is one amp over the continious current rating of the motor but will go down rapidly as the prop unloads in the air. AUW with the 1200 is 15.9 oz and with 2100 is 17.8 oz. So with the 1200, I have 107 watts/lb and a wing loading of about 6.6 oz/sq ft.
</p>
<p>
With the 2100, its 148.6 watt/lb with a wing loading of approximately 7.5 oz/sq ft; with that kind of power, wings are really unecessary anyway so I&#39;ll go with the 2100!
</p>
<p>
Mods are extensive and include the landing gear, front carbon loop prop guard, extra carbon rod reinforcing, plywood reinforced firewall, E-flite Park 450 motor instead of recommended Park 400, tail skid and the use of UHU Glue instead of the recommended epoxy.
</p>
<p>
Link to <a href="http://www.boomerseflight.com/videos/" target="_new"><strong>Boomer&#39;s Maiden Flight</strong></a> &#8211; click on <strong>BlackWing Maiden.wmv</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/07/boomers-black-wing-build/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How Fast&#8221; Model Aircraft Airspeed Instrument</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/01/how-fast-model-aircraft-airspeed-instrument/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/01/how-fast-model-aircraft-airspeed-instrument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure you have all heard someone assert that his plane does 50, 60, 70 or more mph. When pressed on how this speed was measured, you&#8217;ll usually get answers that indicate a LOT of windage. If only we had an air speed instrument for model planes. The good guys at Winged Shadow Systems were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you have all heard someone assert that his plane does 50, 60, 70 or more mph. When pressed on how this speed was measured, you&#8217;ll usually get answers that indicate a LOT of windage. If only we had an air speed instrument for model planes.</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span></p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/hf1.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="600" height="514" /></div>
<p>The good guys at <a href="http://www.wingedshadow.com/" target="_new"><strong>Winged Shadow Systems</strong></a> were nice enough to send a sample of their <a href="http://rcreporter.com/howfast.html" target="_new"><strong>How Fast Model Aircraft Airspeed Instrument</strong></a> to try out.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/hf2.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="500" height="469" /></div>
<p><strong>Key Features</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>15 &#8211; 500 mph / 24 &#8211; 800 km/h airspeed, 1 mph / km/h resolution</li>
<li>Includes Pitot and Static Probes</li>
<li>Plugs into your receiver or any 3.2v to 12v battery, draws 1.3 mA</li>
<li>Light Emitting Diode (LED) used for communication</li>
<li>Size 1.05&#8243; x 0.65&#8243; (26.7 x 16.5 mm); Total Weight 0.2 oz / 6 grams</li>
<li>Optional <strong>See How</strong> display accessory, 9 in-flight speeds, resolution to 0.1 mph /<br />
km/h, 10 flight memory</li>
<li><a href="http://rcreporter.com/HFinstr.pdf" target="_new"><strong>Instruction Manual</strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>This diminutive package uses the same differential pressure sensing as on full-scale aircraft. Airspeed indicators measure the difference between ambient air pressure and total pressure in flight due to the plane&#8217;s forward motion (&#8220;ram air&#8221;) captured with the pitot tube. Obstructing the free flow of air of these tubes will compromise accuracy, as will off-center tube placement. The &#8220;How-Fast&#8221; captures the highest speed flown.</p>
<p>The Static Tube has four small holes drilled in it and is sealed on one end, the Pitot Tube is open on both ends:</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/hf3.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="332" height="530" /></div>
<p>The unit mounts in the wing</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/hf4.gif" border="0" alt="Pic" width="281" height="204" /></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><span><strong>Drawing courtesy of Winged Shadow Systems</strong></span></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>or on the wing for flat wings &#8211; the key is to make sure that the two tubes are NOT in the prop wash and that they extend at least ½&#8221; from the wing &#8211; the Static Tube&#8217;s small holes must extend at least ½&#8221; from the wing. You must ensure that they are parallel to the fuselage and level. The open parts of the tubes can be shortened if needed. Also note that you can shorten or lengthen the tubing between the instrument and the tubes &#8211; as long as they are not kinked, length should not be an issue.</p>
<p>Reading the unit requires that you wave your finger over the LED to trigger its read-out BEFORE you turn the power off. Once triggered, it flashes steady for about 4 seconds, then the LED flashes the speed &#8211; for example, for 123 mph you&#8217;ll see one flash, pause, two flashes, pause, then 3 flashes. Two digit speeds, eg 46, will report as four flashes, pause, then six flashes; zero is a quick double flash. Once you read this speed, it will be stored in memory and can be recalled later, even after powering down.</p>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/hf5.gif" border="0" alt="Pic" width="176" height="213" /></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><span><strong>Drawing courtesy of Winged Shadow Systems</strong></span></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>I found the finger waving requires some practice to get right. First you should have the LED pointing squarely at the sun or a light bulb &#8211; it&#8217;s triggered by the difference between light and shadow. I found one way to get a reading is to use a flashlight &#8211; hold it close to the LED and then wave; the waving cycle requires some experimentation &#8211; practice this before you mount it. I shot a video (blurry) of this process &#8211; the readout flashes 46 mph &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q04GYRUH_8" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Performance </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>After getting the finger waving down, I tested the &#8220;How Fast&#8221; by mounting the unit on my car&#8217;s mirror and driving 60 mph on the highway. I found the unit recorded an average of 56 mph. This is within the accuracy range according to my query on this to Winged Shadow Systems:</p>
<p><strong><span>&#8220;From our tests on a wide variety of installations, in the range of typical model flight speeds (30 MPH to 120 MPH) I’d say you can expect a peak reading well within 5 MPH of your true airspeed.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<p>Accurate mounting of the tubes is critical to accuracy:</p>
<p><strong><span>&#8220;A unique (and potentially large) source of errors is the mounting of the Pitot and Static tubes.  Careful alignment of the tubes directly into the direction of flight will give excellent results.  Miss-pointed tubes or locating the tubes in the prop blast can create significant errors.  Of course, clogged or pinched tubes can make the readings useless.  Since the How Fast makes offset readings at power-up and again when the report is activated, strong winds into the sensor probes at these times can also cause minor errors.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<p>I mounted the How Fast on one of my foamies by taping the tubes to the flat wing and found it&#8217;s moving quite nicely with speeds in the high 30s.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Conclusions </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Short of a radar gun (really expensive) or a measured course, measuring a plane&#8217;s speed anectdotally is not terribly accurate. The How Fast looks like a reasonable solution &#8211; while not cheap (what is in this hobby?) at $45, sharing it among a few flyers or buying it by a club to share among its members to determine plane speed with some accuracy could be one way to lower cost, although you can&#8217;t discount &#8220;bragging rights&#8221;.</p>
<p>Many thanks to Dave at <a href="http://www.wingedshadow.com/" target="_new"><strong>Winged Shadow Systems</strong></a> for sending this our way to test out. Overall, a nice package!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/06/01/how-fast-model-aircraft-airspeed-instrument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Second Plane</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/30/your-second-plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/30/your-second-plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beginner Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most beginners start their RC flying adventures with an RTF (Ready To Fly) package &#8211; this includes the plane, transmitter, receiver and batteries &#8211; the whole package. Having now &#8220;mastered&#8221; the art of flight, it&#8217;s time to move on to your next plane &#8211; but which one? Let&#8217;s first assess where you stand with your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most beginners start their RC flying adventures with an RTF (<strong>R</strong>eady <strong>T</strong>o <strong>F</strong>ly) package &#8211; this includes the plane, transmitter, receiver and batteries &#8211; the whole package. Having now &#8220;mastered&#8221; the art of flight, it&#8217;s time to move on to your next plane &#8211; but which one?</p>
<p><span id="more-93"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s first assess where you stand with your flying skills:</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re the rare 1 in 100 for which RC flying is drop-dead easy stuff, you&#8217;re now able to take off, do some simple aerobatics &#8211; such as loops and spins &#8211; land and you&#8217;ve pretty well internalized how to control the plane when it&#8217;s flying away from you or toward you without thinking about it. Most likely your trainer is rudder and elevator only &#8211; no ailerons.</p>
<p>In short, you&#8217;ve got the basics pretty well nailed down. However, you&#8217;ve done this with a plane that&#8217;s built to be very forgiving &#8211; more than likely a high wing trainer. These are configured to be fairly &#8220;goof-proof&#8221; &#8211; they will tend to self-correct if you let the sticks go, fly slow enough to allow corrections in a second or two to take effect and generally be very tolerant of over-correcting the plane.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s next? <strong>A WARBIRD! Can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on a P51 or Spitfire!</strong></p>
<p>Time out! This is where most beginners learn the hard way that a basic trainer is not a warbird trainer.</p>
<p>Flying a plane is an exercise in controlling a moving object in the air &#8211; speed is something to consider very carefully when selecting any model. A trainer flying at a modest 20 mph does not seem too fast, but let&#8217;s consider how fast 20 mph is in feet / second:</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>20 mph = 29.3 feet / second </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say your 30 feet off the deck and have to correct from a bad turn &#8211; you have one second to do it. Presumably you&#8217;ve honed your reaction time so that you can recover OK. How much time does a warbird give you? Let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s cruising speed is 40 mph:</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>40 mph = 58.6 feet / second </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re 30 feet off the deck, you now have a half second to recover &#8211; and this for a new plane with unfamiliar, and unforgiving, handling. In level flight on a small field, blink your eyes and it&#8217;s gone. If you like to glue small foam pieces, this is a great way to do it.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Desirable Characteristics for a Second Plane </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start from scratch &#8211; what should you look for?</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Ailerons:</strong> If you&#8217;ve learned with rudder and elevator, the next step is ailerons. Most likely you&#8217;ve learned using the right stick for rudder and elevator control, so graduating to using the right stick for elevator and ailerons is not a jarring change. Banking right or left will be more responsive but not all that different. The rudder is now on the left side with the throttle &#8211; unless your plane has a steerable tail wheel, you can easily fly without touching the rudder.</li>
<li><strong>Fly Fast or Slow:</strong> You&#8217;re still learning &#8211; flying an unfamiliar plane that requires a fair amount of speed to stay airborne cuts down on your reaction time &#8211; a plane that is flyable fast or slow mitigates this problem.</li>
<li><strong>Moderate Wing Loading:</strong> The higher the wing loading, the faster the plane must fly to stay aloft; ideally something under 15 ounces/ft² will keep things reasonable.</li>
<li><strong>Dual Rates:</strong> The transmitter should be capable of setting the control surfaces for two rates &#8211; low and high<br />
rates. This means that with a flick of a switch, the control surfaces will move just enough to control the plane moderately (Low Rates); after gaining experience with the plane, you can select High Rates for more aerobatic-like rates.</li>
<li><strong>Highly Survivable:</strong> You&#8217;re still learning &#8211; you need a plane that will not turn into a pile of foam or toothpicks the first time you have a &#8220;close encounter of the ground kind&#8221;. This means foam of some kind.</li>
<li><strong>Easily Repairable:</strong> This does not mean only that spare parts are available &#8211; the plane should be &#8220;glue friendly&#8221; so you can easily make those inevitable small repairs that crop up.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Choices </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>If you have an RTF, the first decision you have to make is &#8220;Do I go RTF again, or do I buy a re-usable transmitter package?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most likely the RTF package you have is a three channel rig &#8211; ailerons with rudder require a minimum of four channels, so porting your three channel RTF rig is not feasible. <a href="index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=61&amp;Itemid=31" target="_new"><strong>This article</strong></a> lists some radios to consider &#8211; definitely go for the best computer radio you can afford.</p>
<p>If you decide to buy another RTF package, your choices narrow fairly quickly &#8211; IMHO there are two good RTF options available which meet most of the criteria listed above. Many of the other &#8220;intermediate&#8221; RTF planes use ailerons but no rudder &#8211; so you&#8217;re buying another three channel rig.</p>
<hr />
<div><a href="http://www.lightflite.com/" target="_new"><strong>Lightflite RC Bug</strong></a></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/0530071.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="450" height="338" /></div>
<ul>
<li>Wingspan: 23.5 inches</li>
<li>Wing area: 340 in²</li>
<li>Flying Weight: 6 1/2 oz</li>
<li>Wing Loading: 2.8 oz/sq ft</li>
</ul>
<p>My favorite plane &#8211; my full review <a href="index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=46&amp;Itemid=29" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a> The Bug can be set up as a trainer or for full aerobatics &#8211; it can be bought as an RTF with a Spektrum DX6 radio &#8211; this is one of the top six channel transmitters on the market and will serve your needs for years to come. I can attest from my own experience that the Bug is extremely tough and a great park flyer &#8211; a forum on it <a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=670844" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
<hr />
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/0530072.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="471" height="250" /></div>
<div><a href="http://www.multiplexusa.com/models/ParkFliers/minimag.htm" target="_new"><strong>Multiplex Minimag</strong></a></div>
<ul>
<li>Wingspan: 39.8&#8243;</li>
<li>Flying Weight: 20.5 oz</li>
<li>Wing Loading: 8.4 oz/sq ft</li>
</ul>
<p>This is made of easily repairable foam and is very tough. The multiplex is available as a kit, ARF or RTF package. Do a search on the RC forums and you will see many positive references on it.</p>
<hr />ARF kits require you to buy the transmitter, receiver, motor etc. One frequently mentioned that meets some of the criteria above:</p>
<div><a href="http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&amp;I=LXHCL2&amp;P=M" target="_new"><strong>GWS Estarter</strong></a></div>
<div><img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/0530073.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="350" height="237" /></div>
<ul>
<li>Wingspan: 37.8&#8243;</li>
<li>Wing Area: 265 in²</li>
<li>Flying Weight: 16.9oz</li>
<li>Wing Loading: 9 oz/sq ft</li>
</ul>
<p>The GWS Estarter is one that many recommend as an aileron trainer. This is an ARF but it&#8217;s a good start. Do a search on the RC forums and you will see many positive references on it.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div><strong>Conclusions </strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s very easy to succumb to the dark side &#8211; resist the temptation to jump from that docile high wing trainer to a snarling war bird as your second plane. Some do and they&#8217;re fine &#8211; most transitioning from a basic trainer will not have a great experience. A better plan is to graduate to a tough, repairable aileron trainer with a radio package that&#8217;s going to meet your future flying needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/30/your-second-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kits and RTFs For The Beginner</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/27/kits-and-rtfs-for-the-beginner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/27/kits-and-rtfs-for-the-beginner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beginner Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most kits will come with step by step instructions. If you want to build, I would suggest a plane from Mountain Models as your first kit. their planes are easy to build and they fly very nicely. If you want to build foam, I would suggest the Magpie; if you want to build wood, get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most kits will come with step by step instructions.<br />
<br /><span id="more-92"></span><br />If you want to build, I would suggest a plane from <a href="http://www.mountainmodels.com/index.php?cPath=25_29" target="_new"><strong>Mountain Models</strong></a> as your first kit. their planes are easy to build and they fly very nicely.</p>
<p>
If you want to build foam, I would suggest the Magpie; if you want to build wood, get the SmoothE with the slow-fly wing &#8211; wood fuselage with a foam wing. I just finished one of these. Mountain models can provide the servos, ESC and the motor as well as the battery. They make it very easy for you.
</p>
<p>
For the Magpie, this would be your lowest cost radio option. Tell them you have this package and they will know what to add.<br />
For a &quot;free&quot; Hitec Radio, go <a href="http://forums.flyesl.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=240" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
For the SmoothE, you will want a little more flexible radio &#8211; Hitec Laser &#8211; tell them if you get this package and they will know what to add. If you have more budget, then read <a href="http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4454" target="_new"><strong>&quot;Don&#39;t Buy a Standard Radio&quot;.</strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...=LXLGF5**&amp;P=ML" target="_new"><strong>Hitec Laser 4 4-Channel FM Micro/2 HS55 Servos</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
However, if you want to get in to flying in the quickest, least expensive way, I would recommend one of these as your first plane:
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&amp;I=LXFXV0&amp;P=ML" target="_new"><strong>Multiplex Easy Star EP RTF 54&quot;</strong></a> &#8211; $175
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
I have flown the Easy Star &#8211; Great plane for new flyers! It&#39;s made of super tough foam, a good parkflyer and a good glider.<br />
In the US the RTF package comes with a 72 MHz radio system that can be used to fly other planes
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Build Thread</strong><br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=350408" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a> and<br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=459096" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><strong>Videos</strong><br />
	<a href="http://plawner.org/video/easygo.wmv" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a> and<br />
	<a href="http://plawner.org/video/easystar.wmv" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><strong>Mods, upgrades and more</strong><br />
	<a href="http://www.mpx-easystar.de/" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><strong>Add Ailerons &#8211; Start at post 195</strong><br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=350408&amp;page=13&amp;pp=15" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><strong>Travel Box</strong><br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=468625&amp;goto=newpost" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=HBZ7100" target="_new"><strong>HobbyZone Super Cub RTF Electric</strong></a> &#8211; $159
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
This is the only semi-scale plane on my list. I have not<br />
flown this one but the flood of excellent reports leads me<br />
to recommend it to new flyers. If you REALLY need a plane that looks<br />
like something people would be in, this is the one I will<br />
recommend. It takes the same Xport accessories as other<br />
HobbyZone and ParkZone planes so you can drop bombs, parachutes and attach<br />
other accessories to extend your fun. It has a steerable tail<br />
wheel so you can effectively taxi the plane. Great for ROG launches.
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Photos and Videos</strong> <a href="http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/ProductGallery.aspx?ProdID=HBZ7100" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a> Other Excellent Video &#8211; Hi res for high speed connect users<br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=567625#post6040744" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a> and<br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showatt.php?attachmentid=1051938" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><a href="http://www.horizonhobby.com/ProdInfo/Files/HBZSuperCubManualCropped.pdf" target="_new"><strong>Super Cub Manual</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><strong>Discussions on the Forums</strong><br />
	<a href="http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12218" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a>.<br />
	<a href="http://forums.radiocontrolzone.com/showthread.php?p=2130521#post2130521" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a>,<br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=593044#post6385310" target="_new"><strong>HERE</strong></a>, and<br />
	<a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=550899" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.readytoflyfun.com/thawk3chrtf.html" target="_new"><strong>T-Hawk RTF</strong></a> &#8211; Excellent Value &#8211; $160-170
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
This company is really putting together some outstanding<br />
packages. I have flown the T-Hawk &#8211; an excellent first plane.<br />
Get the Extreme value package &#8211; it comes with an extra wing,<br />
tail and battery. This plane stands up to hard landings and<br />
can be flown on 27 MHz or 72 MHz.
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.readytoflyfun.com/thawnimwssfm.html" target="_new"><strong>T-Hawk &#8211; Without Radio &#8211; add your radio and receiver</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><a href="http://www.readytoflyfun.com/t72rtfpatrpa.html" target="_new"><strong><br />
	T-Hawk RTF 72MHz Partner Training Package</strong></a> &#8211; $279 -This is really unique!
	</li>
<li><a href="http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243202&amp;highlight=THawk" target="_new"><strong>T-Hawk Discussion Thread</strong></a>
	</li>
<li><a href="http://www.readytoflyfun.com/thawkvideos.html" target="_new"><strong>Videos</strong></a>
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products...ProdID=HBZ3600" target="_new"><strong>Aerobird 3</strong></a> &#8211; $110
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
I started on an Aerobird RTF and have hundreds of flights on my Aerobirds. I also thermal and slope soar this plane -<br />
flies well and stands up to hard landings. Their add-on fun accessories for<br />
night flying, air to air combat and drop module add to the fun! The combat module makes a<br />
great lost plane locator, even if you don&#39;t plan to fly combat. Great keep-in-the-car<br />
plane &#8211; take off the wing and it goes back<br />
in the box fully assembled. Most can&#39;t do that!
</p>
<hr />
Clear Skies and Safe Flying<br />
<strong>Ed Anderson</strong> (5/26/07)</p>
<p>
This thread can be seen <a href="http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20094" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/27/kits-and-rtfs-for-the-beginner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio/Servo Set Up &#8211; Step By Step Process</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/24/radioservo-set-up-step-by-step-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/24/radioservo-set-up-step-by-step-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beginner Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my basic set-up procedure, regardless of plane or radio brand. This assumes a six channel computer radio controlling a full house plane that has flaps and retractable landing gear. I will touch on what you can do if you don&#39;t have flaps or landing gear later in the post. If you have more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my basic set-up procedure, regardless of plane or radio brand.<br />
<br /><span id="more-91"></span><br />This<br />
assumes a six channel computer radio controlling a full house plane that<br />
has flaps and retractable landing gear. I will touch on what you can do if<br />
you don&#39;t have flaps or landing gear later in the post. If you have more or<br />
less channels, the steps will be the same but the options will be a little<br />
different.</p>
<p>
Hitec/Futaba Channel Assignments<br />
JR, Airtronics and others may use different sequence &#8211; doesn&#39;t matter
</p>
<ul>
<li>Aileron in 1 &#8211; If you have two servos, you use a Y cable
	</li>
<li>Elevator in 2
	</li>
<li>Throttle in 3
	</li>
<li>Rudder in 4
	</li>
<li>Landing gear in 5
	</li>
<li>Flaps in 6 &#8211; If you have two servos, you use a Y cable
	</li>
</ul>
<p>I usually power up the radio and select a new memory position. If I am<br />
replacing an existing profile that I am no longer using, I reset all values<br />
to stock settings of 0 or 100% as called for in each case.</p>
<p>
This procedure assumes you have your servos mounted and the control<br />
rods/cables attached to the surfaces and the servo arms off the servos.
</p>
<p>
Power up the plane. If this is an electric plane, I use a 4 cell receiver<br />
pack battery rather than the motor battery attached to the BEC in the ESC as<br />
I don&#39;t want the motor in play right now.
</p>
<p>
Check for servo direction. When you work the servo, will the servo move the<br />
surfaces in the proper direction? If not, you use the <strong>servo reverse feature</strong><br />
to change their direction. If you are using a standard radio that doesn&#39;t<br />
have servo reverse, then you need to remount the servo so the arms move in<br />
the right direction.
</p>
<p>
To center the surfaces, I hold the surfaces centered with one hand and put<br />
on the servo arms, connected to the rods or cables, so that I have the<br />
surfaces centered as close as possible when I set the arms on. If I have a<br />
screw on/off clevis at the servo end, I will make adjustments so that I can<br />
put the servo arm on and be sitting right at the point where the surface is<br />
centered.
</p>
<p>
When happy with the position, I set the servo arm and put in the servo arm screw.<br />
If necessary I might add some adjustment at the surface end if it has an<br />
adjustable clevis to further center the surfaces. This is especially<br />
important if you don&#39;t have the ailerons or the flaps each on its own<br />
channel. I want them 99% right from the mechanicals.
</p>
<p>
Only when this is done do I do any final centering using the radio. On my<br />
radios, the menu is <strong>subtrim</strong> that is used to center the servos <strong>AFTER</strong> you have<br />
done as much mechanical centering as you can. If each aileron or flap is on<br />
their own channel, then I can do more from the radio for the<br />
final fine tuning.
</p>
<p>
You can adjust max throws using control horn position but I normally do this<br />
from the radio. I use the radio&#39;s ATV/EPA to set the max throws on each<br />
channel.
</p>
<p>
Then I would decide on what I want for dual rates and exponential on each<br />
channel. Typically I use 100% high with 30% expo and 70% low with 30% expo<br />
as my starting points.
</p>
<p>
Now, if you don&#39;t have flaps and you have your ailerons on separate<br />
channels &#8211; 1 &amp; 6 in this example &#8211; then you may want to set the flapperon mix<br />
so you can adjust them individually from the radio and set aileron<br />
differential if you like. This also allows you to retask the ailerons as<br />
flapperons for landing.
</p>
<p>
If you don&#39;t have retractable landing gear, some radios will let you put the<br />
second aileron on channel 5, or the second flap servo on channel 5.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Throttle Set-Up
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
If this is a glow plane, then you use the same procedure to adjust the servo<br />
that will control the throttle. If this is an electric plane, you should<br />
follow the procedure recommended by the ESC maker.
</p>
<p>
That would be basic set-up.
</p>
<ul>
<li>Once you get to the field, be sure to a range check before you even think<br />
	about flying
	</li>
<li>Make sure you have the right model selected on your computer radio
	</li>
<li>Confirm all surfaces are moving in the right direction
	</li>
<li>Confirm there is no binding of any of the control rods, cables or the<br />
	surfaces
	</li>
<li>Confirm everything is centered
	</li>
</ul>
<p>When you do your first flight, <strong>ASSUME THERE IS A MISTAKE</strong> or that the plane is<br />
out of trim because you are going to have to be prepared to deal with a<br />
problem very quickly.</p>
<p>
Once you get it into the air and flying at a good height, then you start to<br />
check the trim and make whatever changes are needed. Remember that a<br />
handling problem may be do to an incorrectly set CG. This might be masked by<br />
adjustments you can make in trim, but that will make the plane fly<br />
inefficiently and may even make it dangerous. So be sure your CG is right as<br />
well.
</p>
<hr />
Clear Skies and Safe Flying<br />
<strong>Ed Anderson</strong> (4/2/06)</p>
<p>
This thread can be seen <a href="http://www.rchangout.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11845" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/24/radioservo-set-up-step-by-step-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putting It All Together</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/17/putting-it-all-together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/17/putting-it-all-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beginner Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matching a brushless motor, lipo battery and ESC may be confusing at first, but understanding how each relates to the other will demystify this issue. Step 1: The Plane The first step is to determine your power requirements. Since the objective is to drive a plane, you have to determine what your plane needs to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matching a brushless motor, lipo battery and ESC may be confusing at first, but understanding how each relates to the other will demystify this issue.<br />
<br /><span id="more-90"></span>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Step 1: The Plane
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
The first step is to determine your power requirements. Since the objective is to drive a plane, you have to determine what your plane needs to fly the way you want. For example, is the plane a trainer, scale model, aerobatic or full 3D? Each will need a different power plant. One criteria to determine motor sizing is based on watts/pound (total flying weight):
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>50-70</strong> watts/pound: Minimum level of power for decent performance, good for lightly loaded slow flyer and park flyer models
	</li>
<li><strong>70-90</strong> watts/pound; Trainer and slow flying scale models
	</li>
<li><strong>90-110</strong> watts/pound: Sport aerobatic and fast flying scale models
	</li>
<li><strong>110-130</strong> watts/pound: Advanced aerobatic and high-speed models
	</li>
<li><strong>130-150</strong> watts/pound: Lightly loaded 3D models and ducted fans
	</li>
<li><strong>150-200+</strong> watts/pound: Unlimited performance 3D models
	</li>
</ul>
<p><strong></p>
<div align="center">
<span>Table courtesy of E-flite</span>
</div>
<p></strong></p>
<p>
Another method is to determine the required thrust/weight ratio. For this you start with the total flying weight of the plane:
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>50% thrust to weight ratio:</strong> Minimum required for &quot;sedate&quot; flying
	</li>
<li><strong>80-100% thrust to weight ratio:</strong> Recommended for trainer type planes &#8211; enough power to get out of trouble easily
	</li>
<li><strong>120% thrust to weight ratio:</strong> For unlimited vertical performance and 3D flying
	</li>
<li><strong>200-300% thrust to weight ratio:</strong> For speed and wild aerobatics with light weight foam planes
	</li>
</ul>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Step 2: Motor/Propeller Specifications
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
Almost all motors sold will spec their power requirements such as seen below:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/efl480.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="406" height="389" />
</div>
<p>
In this instance, you can estimate total watts by multiplying the volts by amps &#8211; in this case 12 volts x 22 amps (continuous) = 264 watts.
</p>
<p>
Note that there is no thrust data &#8211; not all will give thrust data. Scorpion is one that does gives excellent data on each motor:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/scor.gif" border="0" alt="Pic" width="568" height="946" />
</div>
<p>
Note that the propeller used will have a large impact on power requirements. For more on Propeller Selection, go <a href="index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=66&amp;Itemid=31" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
In general, slow flying props are designed to deliver high thrust at relatively low rpms and &quot;E&quot; props are designed to enhance speed over thrust. For example, if you have a scale biplane, a slow fly prop might be more appropriate; a war bird, eg a P51 Mustang, typically flies faster and will use an &quot;E&quot; prop.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Step 3: Battery Specifications
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
Once the motor is selected, you need to match a battery to the motor&#39;s power specs. Let&#39;s assume your motor/prop combination will draw 15 amps. The lipo battery that will meet this requirement must be capable of delivering at least 15 amps on a continuous basis. This is where the battery&#39;s &quot;C&quot; rating comes in.
</p>
<p>
Lipos are rated by voltage and capacity; capacity is stated in mah &#8211; milli amp hours &#8211; a measure of how much the battery holds. As an example, if you look on this label you&#39;ll see six key numbers (circled in red):
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/0326071.jpg" border="0" alt="Lipo" width="608" height="428" />
</div>
<p>
The &quot;25C cont&quot; means 25C continuous; the &quot;40C burst&quot; refers to how fast the Lipo can be rapidly discharged for a SHORT time period, something like 15-30 seconds; look at this as the &quot;supercharger&quot; rating &#8211; to be used rarely. The second set of numbers &#8211; 55A cont/88 burst &#8211; are what this battery can deliver to the system considering its capacity &#8211; 2200 mah.
</p>
<p>
The two ratings &#8211; mah and &quot;C&quot;, combine to tell you how intensively this battery can be used with the following formula:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong><span>Continuous amp draw = (mah * 0.001) * (C continuous rating)<br />
Continuous amp draw = (2200 * 0.001) * 25 = 55 Amps Continuous<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p>
<strong><span>Burst amp draw = (mah * 0.001) * (C Burst rating)<br />
Burst amp draw = (2200 * 0.001) * 40 = 88 Amps Burst</span></strong>
</p>
</div>
<p>
In our example the battery at a minimum MUST deliver 15 Amps. If you over-discharge a lipo battery, it will get VERY hot and probably catch fire; at a minimum it will ruin the battery. To be safe, it&#39;s a good practice to use a battery that will deliver MORE THAN what&#39;s required &#8211; the motor will draw only what it needs, you can not &quot;force feed&quot; it with a larger battery.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Step 4: Match The ESC (Electronic Speed Controller) To The Motor/Prop Selection
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
Once you&#39;ve matched your model&#39;s power requirements to a motor/prop/battery combination, you need an ESC that will handle the power required. ESCs are rated in Amps, so you need an ESC that will handle the maximum required Amps. In our example of a motor drawing 15 Amps, you need a 15 Amp brushless ESC. These ratings are typically written on the ESC:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/sc35esc.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="600" height="222" />
</div>
<p>
This one is rated at 35 Amps at a maximum of 15 volts. It&#39;s a good practice to use an ESC that&#39;s rated for at least 30% more Amps than you need &#8211; it will run cooler and you will not stress it as much as one rated closer to your requirement. In our example where the motor will draw 15 Amps, an ESC rated for 20 amps will give you a nice safety margin.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
CONCLUSIONS
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
A little homework up front will go a long way to keeping your flying trouble free. If your motor does not have any data, you need a wattmeter to help in your setup. A rule of thumb that can get you started is that in general a motor will deliver 100 watts/ounce of motor weight. However, it&#39;s only a rule of thumb and only real world testing will give confirm a trouble free setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/17/putting-it-all-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Propeller Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/15/propeller-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/15/propeller-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beginner Guides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One area that seems to befuddle many new, and some experienced, fliers is selecting the right propeller. The prop is the final piece of the electrical drive chain that starts with the battery and ends with the motor/prop combination. In general, it&#39;s a good practice to use a battery and ESC that&#39;s rated higher than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One area that seems to befuddle many new, and some experienced, fliers is selecting the right propeller.<br />
<br /><span id="more-89"></span><br />The prop is the final piece of the electrical drive chain that starts with the battery and ends with the motor/prop combination. In general, it&#39;s a good practice to use a battery and ESC that&#39;s rated higher than the motor&#39;s spec &#8211; this gives you some &quot;overhead&quot; so that you&#39;re not driving the battery and ESC at their limits.</p>
<p>
The prop&#39;s job is to accelerate air to keep the plane flying &#8211; the result is measured by thrust. We can estimate thrust for a given prop at a given rpm by the following formula:
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>(((prop diam/2)² x 3.141 x pitch x rpm) / 1728) x 1.22416 = thrust (oz/sec)</strong>
</div>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
<span></p>
<div align="center">
Note: Air weight 1.22416 oz/ft³ at sea level
</div>
<p></span>
</p>
<p>
You can see the large impact a prop&#39;s diameter has as its impact on the volume of air is squared. The power needed to turn a prop depends on its rpm, diameter and pitch as shown in the following equation:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<strong>power = k x rpm^3 x diameter^4 x pitch</strong>
</div>
<p>
<span></p>
<div align="center">
k is a constant
</div>
<p></span>
</p>
<p>
A propeller&#39;s pitch is the theoretical distance it will travel along the axis of rotation in one complete revolution &#8211; the more pitch, the more the prop will travel, and consequently the faster the plane will travel &#8211; ie more speed. As the equation shows, a prop&#39;s diameter once again has more impact on required power than its rpm &#8211; replacing an 8 inch prop with a 9 inch will have a large impact on required power.
</p>
<p>
A simple formula to estimate a prop&#39;s load factor (PLF &#8211; credit to Lucien Miller for this) is:
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
PLF = Diameter³ x Pitch
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
Using this formula can help in determining equivalent props as shown below:
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="center">
<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/PLFTable.gif" border="0" alt="PLF Table" width="737" height="324" />
</div>
<p>
This can also give a good approximation on how the power requirement will change when switching to a different prop. It is certainly possible to trade off diameter and pitch to keep the power requirements about the same among various prop sizes.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Prop Types: Slow Fly vs &quot;E&quot; Props
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
There are basically two prop types in popular use:
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Slow Fly:</strong> Props designed to deliver high thrust at relatively low rpms (hence lower air speed) are designated as Slow Fly props. These props have a larger blade area compared to &quot;E&quot; props to move more air at lower rpms and the pitch will be finer &#8211; 10&#215;4.7 is one example. Slow Fly props are more delicate than &quot;E&quot; props &#8211; although not all manufacturers give rpm limits, generally limiting these props to 65,000 rpm/diameter is a good practice &#8211; eg a 10&quot; slow fly prop should not exceed 6,500 rpm.
<p>
	A slow fly prop is like a car&#39;s low gear &#8211; lots of power to start, climb hills etc, but driving on the highway at 70 mph in second gear is NOT recommended. Consequently slow fly props enable fast takeoffs, quick climbs, vertical acceleration, hovering and 3D type maneuvers better than &quot;E&quot; type props, but at the expense of a lower top speed. Overall high-drag planes, such as biplanes, are more suited to slow fly props.
	</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;
	</p>
</li>
<li><strong>&quot;E&quot; Props:</strong> These props designed to enhance speed over thrust and have more pitch and lower diameter &#8211; a 9&#215;7 is one example. These props look more &quot;traditional&quot; than slow fly props and will be faster in level flight than a slow fly prop &#8211; this if fifth gear, the &quot;highway&quot; gear for speed on level surfaces. E props are designed to handle higher rpms than slow fly props &#8211; although not all manufacturers give rpm limits, generally limiting these props to 190,000 rpm/diameter is a good practice &#8211; eg a 10&quot; E prop should not exceed 19,000 rpm. Overall low-drag planes, such as flying wings, pylon racers etc, are more suited to E props.
<p>
	<strong></p>
<div align="center">
	Props and Motors
	</div>
<p>	</strong>
	</p>
<p>
	The prop used with the motor determines its load in amps &#8211; the volts are determined by the battery. Almost all motors specify some range of props to use with them &#8211; some more than others. E-flite, for example, typically recommends props this way:
	</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;
	</p>
<div align="center">
	<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/efl480.jpg" border="0" alt="Pic" width="406" height="389" />
	</div>
<p>
	Not much to go on. Scorpion gives you a wealth of data:
	</p>
<p>
	&nbsp;
	</p>
<div align="center">
	<img src="/images/stories/articles/artimages/scor.gif" border="0" alt="Pic" width="568" height="946" />
	</div>
<p>
	The Scorpion data is based on actual bench test data and enables you to fine-tune your setup. Other motor manufacturers supply varying levels of prop data; if you buy or have a motor that does not supply this data, then you must develop your own using a wattmeter to determine acceptable motor loads. Lacking any data on a motor places a real burden on the user &#8211; a start is to do a search for similar looking/size motors and use these specs as a starting point.
	</p>
<p>
	<strong>Bottom Line:</strong> If you have a motor and can&#39;t find any specs, you need tools to make them up, a wattmeter at a minimum. A rule of thumb you can use is that each ounce of a brushless motor can handle about 100 watts of power; considering that you can&#39;t find any specs, this is likely a low-end motor and something like 80 watts may be more appropriate.
	</p>
<p>
	There are modeling tools, such as MotoCalc, which can generate recommended propellers for a given configuration, but if you have no data for the motor you&#39;re using, this tool is not going to help much. In fact, any tool is a &quot;GIGO&quot; process &#8211; garbage in, garbage out; you need accurate data to approximate a real world result.
	</p>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/15/propeller-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plane Locators</title>
		<link>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/12/plane-locators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/12/plane-locators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#39;ve ever lost a plane, here&#39;s an inexpensive way to locate a downed plane. I have been flying since March 2003 and have probably passed 2000 flights between my parkflyers and gliders. During my pilot development, I learned how hard it can be to find a plane that has landed in the woods, tall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#39;ve ever lost a plane, here&#39;s an inexpensive way to locate a downed plane.<br />
<br /><span id="more-123"></span>
<p>
I have been flying since March 2003 and have probably passed 2000 flights<br />
between my parkflyers and gliders. During my pilot development, I learned<br />
how hard it can be to find a plane that has landed in the woods, tall grass<br />
and other places where you can&#39;t see it. Fortunately there are aids for<br />
this kind of situation.
</p>
<p>
I lost my Aerobird when a huge gust of wind carried it over deep woods and I<br />
was too inexperienced to deal with it. Even though I was certain I knew<br />
where it went down, I could not find it. I bought another Aerobird and fly it<br />
often.
</p>
<p>
When I moved on to gliders, I started flying a Great Planes Spirit 2<br />
Meter. I got into trouble and it went down into heavy woods and brush. I<br />
went into the woods to find it. Fifty feet into the woods, trying to decide<br />
how to proceed since the area the plane went down could not be seen from a<br />
trail, I heard Beep Beep Beep. The plane was about 150 feet away in heavy<br />
tree growth. I had the plane located and out in 10 minutes. Believe me,<br />
where it had landed I likely would not have found it.
</p>
<p>
The difference was a little device you put in the plane that gets attached<br />
to the receiver. If you turn off the transmitter, the thing starts beeping<br />
loudly and you can hear it from quite a distance.
</p>
<p>
This is what I use in my Spirit Sailplane and several of my other planes<br />
<a href="http://www.californiasailplanes.com/Lost%20model%20alarm.html" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
It hooks to any channel or it can share a channel with one of your servos.<br />
It has the connector to pass through to the servo. This is the one I<br />
recommend to everyone.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Low Voltage Watch
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
In addition to helping me find the planes, the <strong>Digi Alarm</strong> also monitors my<br />
battery pack voltage and sounds an alarm if the pack voltage gets below a<br />
safe level. This is especially valuable on my glider. If I catch a good<br />
thermal, I could be in the air for over an hour, so a pack that tested good<br />
on the ground could run low during the flight.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
Channel Conflict Test!
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
As a test to make sure no one is flying on your channel, turn on the<br />
receiver only. If the device does not go into lost plane mode, then someone<br />
else is on your frequency.
</p>
<p>
Here are some others I have not tried, but look interesting:
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.allthingsrc.com/webshop/product_info.php/cPath/24/products_id/39" target="_new"><strong>Lost Model Locator &#8211; $10</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
Does one job, but does it well &#8211; I hope.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.skykingrcproducts.com/accessories/lostmodel/lost_rc_model_alarm.html" target="_new"><strong>SkyKing RC Lost Model Locator &#8211; $20</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
Review <a href="http://www.slopeflyer.com/artman/publish/skyking_lost_model_alarm.shtml" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.rcreporter.com/products.html" target="_new"><strong>RC Reporter &#8211; $24</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
A bunch of features.
</p>
<p>
The planes I fly most often now have a locator and battery monitor installed<br />
Of course you only need one &#8211; you can move it from plane to plane,<br />
but at $15-30 they are cheap enough you can put one in every plane and<br />
forget it! It is helpful insurance to protect a $150 to $1000 investment.
</p>
<p>
<strong></p>
<div align="center">
LONGER RANGE USE
</div>
<p></strong>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.theplanelocator.com/csi_site/index.html" target="_new"><strong>The Plane Locator</strong></a>
</p>
<p>
This is a radio beacon/finder system. It does not connect to the receiver<br />
but sends out a continuous signal that you can home on with their receiver.
</p>
<p>
From the maker&#39;s web site: About 1/2 mile range. Transmitter is less<br />
than 1&quot; diameter, 1/2&quot; high, and has a weight of less than 1/3 ounce including<br />
the battery. It is powered by a single CR2032 battery that will last for over 30<br />
days of continuous operation and signals you when it needs replacing.<br />
Factory programmed to any one of your choice of 50 channels.
</p>
<p>
The receiver is about $200 and the transmitter that goes in the plane is $50.
</p>
<p>
Many pilots don&#39;t know about these devices. Now you do!
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<hr />
Clear Skies and Safe Flying<br />
<strong>Ed Anderson</strong> (8/31/06)</p>
<p>
This thread can be seen <a href="http://forums.flyesl.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=237" target="_new"><strong>HERE.</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ampaviators.com/2007/05/12/plane-locators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
